Bruce Dubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
>> Hello,
>> I don't regularly use Mutt either. Unfortunately, this also applies to
>> Tin, thus invalidating my proposal to add it.
>
> I think your observation is correct. Right now, we have mutt, pine, and
> slrn. Perhaps we should drop these packages and just mention them in
> the section "Other Mail and News Programs."
>
> OTOH, I have used nail on occasion, but certainly not regularly. It is
> most useful in sending messages from scripts, so that package should stay.
>
> Other opinions?
>
Is the Xwindow (ie xorg) required part of BLFS book? If NOT, I will
vote +1 for mutt in the book.
RATIONALE: It is wery well for small/clean installation without X
subsustem...
also it is well suited for remoute using over ssh chanel.
I am using mutt only from time to time...
---
Dimitry
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
