On Fri, 3 Mar 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 3/3/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard A Downing wrote these words on 03/03/06 11:49 CST:
What is suggested?
I would say libgphoto2 goes in graphics libraries (perhaps general
libs, I'm not sure) and GPhoto2 would go in General utilities.
Thinking about it a little more, I think this is the best suggestion.
libgphoto2 should be wherever libexif is (graphics libs is as good as
any to me), and gphoto2 is definitely more of a utility than a full
blown application.
For the small amount that my views may be worth here, I agree with Dan
and Randy on this - I use a nikon 5700 digicam, and have no use for
libgphoto2 or gphoto2 (although I do use ImageMagick, jhead, libexif,
gimp, gutenprint and ufraw with it).
Ken
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
