Bruce Dubbs wrote: > There is a proposal to replace slrn with tin in the book.
In a fit of 'I can't stand another moment of thunderbird !' a few days ago I built both slrn-cvs (slang-2) and tin. I have to say how good thunderbird and pan are. If I had to run a system without X, then I might just manage with tin, but it would be a struggle. This is quite strange, since I quite like mutt, and thought that I would be happy with either - the main problem is their cache management, not the interface. This is sad, as the gmane mirrors of mailing lists are much easier on the bandwidth/storage than subscribing to mailing lists. So, IMO, ditch slrn, and use your editorial effort in a more fruitful area than console newsreaders. R. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
