Randy McMurchy([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 11:40:46AM -0500: > On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 19:33 +0300, Ag Hatzim wrote: > > > Pulling out 7.0 would only be for the special case of doing a release > here shortly. Everyone agrees (or, rephrasing, there have been many > reports) that the 7.0 build instructions are confusing and need to > be broken up. If we were to release something soon, I think it would > call for a freeze immediately. It's my opinion that the current > instructions for 7.0 are net yet mature enough to release. > Speaking about a new Blfs release (i know it's not relative to this thread,sorry ccing to blfs-dev),nobody answered to Archaic comments [1] ,so i bump them again with emphasis to the following two.
1) What base system is being targetted? a) If 6.1.1, then what about the gcc4-specific stuff? I know the Blfs folks are not really responsible but the questions still remain. > The amount of recent support questions backs up my assertion. If the Blfs team will shortly release a new version,then by all that means,pull it out for a while,because i agree that the (instructions) are not mature enough for a release. I just simple wanted it there just for testing purposes. 1. http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2006-April/014351.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
