On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 20:20 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > For one thing, automount has been around far longer than dbus or hal.
Please, explain. It's not that I'm lazy and can't do the research. It's just that if folks offer information, I'd like to hear the foundation for it. Because Mommy said so, only goes so far. If automount could do everything dbus/hal can (and I'm not just talking about mounting a disk volume), why is there such complication, energy, and changes being devoted to something that already was in place and working? -- Randy rmlinux: [bogomips 3993.32] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.2] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 20:23:30 up 18 days, 2:58, 4 users, load average: 0.24, 0.32, 0.26 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
