Hi all, I have been using a newer version (a release candidate) instead of using a patched 1.0.7 and it works just fine. There's been a whole slew of bug fixes, it seems mature and a full release (1.0.8) is probably right around the corner.
1.0.7 is almost a year and a half old, the 1.0.8-rc4 is a few days old. Many, many bug fixes. Of course, there is no GCC issue and everything works just fine as best as I can tell. A little bit of juggling would be required in the dependencies. There is an open bug (though there is a patch to fix the bug) about 1.0.7 and I'm thinking it may be better to go with the bug fixed release candidate version (it is an rc4, this may end up being the production release) instead of using a patched 1.0.7. Thoughts? -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 18:29:00 up 16 days, 6:06, 1 user, load average: 0.30, 0.33, 0.42 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
