Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 04/25/06 09:53 CST: > Maybe. gnome-volume-manager would need testing without gnome-mount to > see if it would still work correctly. The code looks like it has > fallbacks, though. The configury checks for HAL => 0.5.4, so maybe it > would work. Except that gnome-vfs-2.14.0 wants HAL => 0.5.7, so > you're back to having a hal without fstab-sync. gnome-2.14 is gonna > have to wait until a conclusion about what to do in the absence of > fstab-sync is reached.
Be careful. Last time an Editor put one task (HAL update) as something to consider before doing the other task (update GNOME), somebody came on screaming FUD, FUD, FUD. :-) -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 09:57:01 up 30 days, 21:34, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.13, 0.19 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
