DJ Lucas wrote:
Anyway, this works since we
have to modify it, and is consistant with libpng-config's result, but
would the patch be the better option?
Forgot to add:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /media/lfs/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.10
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7df2000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ldd /usr/lib/libpng12.so.0.1.2.8
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libz.so.1 => /lib/libz.so.1 (0xb7f59000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xb7f34000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb7e13000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x80000000)
Just seems strange that the developers haven't fixed this, 5 revisions
later. I think the libpng-config file (and pc file) is the correct
place to handle this, at least as the developer had intended it to be.
I'm not sure why they do it that way. Probably should ask the developers.
-- DJ Lucas
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
