[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote these words on 07/15/06 07:42 CST: > There are a number of reasons why someone should want to build the alsa > project's driver tar ball.
There is merit to Mark and Gena's suggestion of including the installation of the ALSA Driver in BLFS. I realize it was decided long ago that it be removed, but I suggest we revisit this. Perhaps not for inclusion in BLFS-6.2, however, if we determine that we should include the ALSA driver, it wouldn't be that hard to test using the ALSA version and if it works, put it back into the book. I don't think it could spawn other breakage down the road, so we're probably safe changing if it is determined that we should. [please defer all discussion of this to the -dev list] -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.23] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 07:46:01 up 8 days, 17:54, 1 user, load average: 0.18, 0.14, 0.08 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
