Christoph Berg wrote: > Am Samstag 14 Oktober 2006 19:22 schrieb Mirko Roller: > >> On Saturday 14 October 2006 18:14, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >>> Mirko Roller wrote: >>> >>>> Problem, the configure script will use an ./libtool in the jpegsrc.v6b >>>> dir. But there is no sutch file ! >>>> >>>> Use this patch to compile jpegsrc.v6b again: >>>> >>>> tar xvfz SOURCE/jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz >>>> cd jpeg* >>>> ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-static --enable-shared && >>>> sed -i '[EMAIL PROTECTED] = ./[EMAIL PROTECTED] = [EMAIL PROTECTED]' >>>> Makefile >>>> make -j 4 && >>>> make install >>>> >>> I haven't followed this, but I think you are doing something wrong. >>> jpegsrc.v6b.tar.gz has been around for *years*. Checking the history, >>> the instructions go back to *at least* 06/12/04 16:56:28 in revision >>> 2304, but I think that they go back to a hint I wrote before BLFS 1.0 >>> (2001, I think). There have been *thousands* of builds since then but >>> this is the first report of a problem. >>> >>> -- Bruce >>> >> svn-lfs with gcc 4.1.1, glibc-2.5 >> >> ./configure does not create an ./libtool file ! ( and there is no after >> depacking ) >> >> Dont know, if it works for others, here it is not. >> >> ciao >> > > There is a patch for this behaivour in the LFS patch repo. It patches > configure and some other files, if I remember correctly. > > -- > Christoph > If you're refering to jpeg-6b-config_update-1.patch . It updates config.sub and config.guess so archs like x86_64, that were added after jpeg was released, works with libtool. It also updates ltconfig and ltmain.sh so libtool looks in the right place for libraries.
Although it shouldn't be needed on x86, It wont hurt anything to use it. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
