Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 01/24/07 11:09 CST: > I'd like to give a little longer. He seems to be working through the > packages since he caught the Xorg error and had a different catch > yesterday.
Well, it seems that the majority want to delay the release cycle. Let's consider it delayed. :-( I don't understand why these updates need to go in, but I consider y'alls opinion valuable enough to delay the release. I wish DJ could communicate a bit better, however, I understand the nature of open source and time commitments. I'll get back to the list after I try to figure out a new release schedule. I have made my Wednesday's available for the next few weeks, so it shouldn't be too difficult to find time. I just hate changes to the schedule at this point to get in some package updates that in my opinion, could easily be deferred until the 6.2.1 release. I mean, there's probably another 60 package updates that *are* being deferred. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 11:13:59 up 14 days, 11:28, 1 user, load average: 1.14, 1.03, 0.64 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
