On 1/30/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've looked at, and tested all the modules that need updating in the > book and feel confident that we can update the book to reflect the > current versions. There are about 10 that need to be updated. > > Dependencies are not affected, and everything builds identically. > > Anyone see any harm in updating BLFS with these newer versions?
Fine by me. Although, low level modules hurt the worst when you get down the road and find out something's broken in the package that you actually care about. I only build a handful from that list, but I chose the newest I could find and haven't had any noticable issues yet. Same for you? -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
