Andrew Beverley wrote these words on 02/07/07 11:58 CST: > Personally I think that's fine. Of course, it should call them > extensions not modules to save confusion.
Thanks for your help today. My last remark is that I call them modules as .so files are built (these are ones just built using the raw headers): -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 7320 Feb 7 11:21 libipt_string.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 7806 Feb 7 11:21 libipt_recent.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 7676 Feb 7 11:21 libipt_dccp.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 6553 Feb 7 11:21 libipt_CLUSTERIP.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 8064 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_rt.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 6685 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_ipv6header.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 6421 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_hbh.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 6536 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_frag.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 4728 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_esp.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 5941 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_dst.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 5557 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_ah.so -rwxr-xr-x 1 rml install 4802 Feb 7 11:21 libip6t_REJECT.so and the book over and over sort of references these files as modules (sometimes plugins). Force of habit for me using the term modules. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:05:00 up 28 days, 12:19, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.07 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
