On Σαβ, Φεβ 17, at 06:14 Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote: > On Σαβ, Φεβ 17, at 03:43 BLFS Trac wrote: > > > > However, it just sends mixed signals to use a dev version when > > there is a stable version available, yet we are stuck using > > "stable" HTML Tidy and FFmpeg when even those package developers > > say to use development versions. > > > > With regards to ffmpeg,a long time ago (almost 1 year and a half),I had > described the situation in one mail to blfs-dev and I had proposed to > make a tarball from cvs.And I still believe that we should update the > fmpeg package with that way. > And here is the link [1].August of 2005.
It's from one reply to you.The subject is GCC-4.0.1. And the relative bit. ============================ With regards to ffmpeg,the problem is that formal releases are rare and the author himeself cleary states to go with cvs. What we can do is to pack a working recent cvs snapshot,and to upload in our site. ============================ I am going to take this discussion to blfs-dev and change the subject a bit. 1. http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2005-August/010857.html -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
