El Lunes, 26 de Marzo de 2007 22:59, Randy McMurchy escribió:
> For that little of time, the convenience of having everything
> together seems a bit better than the alternative.
I'm indifferent about do the change or not, except that if doing the change I
will have a lot of work changing the indexterm tagging on all xLFS books.
But my obligation as XML/XSL maintainer is to say that there is that
posibility and let decide the comunity what to do. If there is some interest
on that index split I will do it, if not I will fix the current
implementation.
Pd: In the POC the pages are splitted properly, but the links are missing.
Looks like there is a bug in the DocBook-XSL code when using both "zone" and
"type" attributes in {indexterm}.
--
Manuel Canales Esparcia
Usuario de LFS nº2886: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
LFS en castellano: http://www.escomposlinux.org/lfs-es http://www.lfs-es.info
TLDP-ES: http://es.tldp.org
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
