Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Dan Nicholson wrote: >> OK. > > There is an inherent (documented in LFS Section 5.1) assumption made for > every package that the instructions given assume that you have done: > > tar -xf <package-tarball> > cd <package-root> > > Your first suggestion would be a good approach, but the second is a > deviation form the norm. I would recommend the first alternative. > > -- Bruce >
True, but the 2nd approach is what's used in BLFS for the PAM and Zsh instructions (and a couple more I think, but I'll have to double-check...), and also in LFS with Vim. And one more little thing...Tcsh instructions say that the "colorls" patch is needed for "Coreutils 6.7" but development LFS uses Coreutils 6.9. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
