Bruce Dubbs wrote: > I think the policy of omitting editline is valid, but if we do decide to > add it as optional dependencies, we should also add a caution that in > some cases editline conflicts with readline (which is installed in LFS).
I would prefer if we don't list libedit as a dependency. libedit is really designed for BSD systems. And as has been mentioned elsewhere, breaks other packages (some of them very badly). We've had this discussion, and it was determined that the best thing to do was simply not list libedit as a dependency. -- Randy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
