On Wed, Aug 01, at 08:23 Randy McMurchy wrote: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > I think the policy of omitting editline is valid, but if we do decide to > > add it as optional dependencies, we should also add a caution that in > > some cases editline conflicts with readline (which is installed in LFS). > > I would prefer if we don't list libedit as a dependency.
I believe the best thing we can do now is to comment out the dependency, and leave it for the next release when we will have enough time to test it in a more thoroughly way. Randy? Your call. -- http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/Hacking -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
