DJ Lucas wrote: <snip />...Otherwise it looks > pretty good without actually using the package. And of course, for book > inclusion, you'd need to provide descriptions of all executables. > Again, as far as whether it's suited for BLFS, that's up to the more > active editors. > > I hope that helps. > > -- DJ Lucas >
Thanks for the comments DJ. I probably wasn't clear enough but the OP was basically just a cut a paste of my build notes, not an attempt at a decent write up. I wanted to get some feeling for the usefulness of the application and whether my build was basically on the right lines. For Zaptel, didn't this bit make sense? "the zaptel package provides the kernel modules and interfaces to allow access to many types of telephony hardware..." I'll try and set /etc/asterisk to 600 but that will mean I'd need to change the owner of that dir also. I currently set it as root:asterisk rather than asterisk:asterisk. Mainly because pretty much everything in /etc is owned by root. Using chmod o=(blank) was a simple way of removing all privileges of the other user without having to change any of the owner and/or group's permissions. Anyway thanks for your comments. I'll wait to see if there is any more interest in Asterisk before spending time writing it up in a more appropriate format. Cheers Alan -- The way out is open! http://www.theopensourcerer.com -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
