Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 06:28:03PM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote: > >> I'm definately not liking the ati drivers now either.... >> >> (WW) AIGLX: 3D driver claims not to support visual [insert every 0x?? >> here except 0x4b] >> >> Guess y'all seeing the same errors? but 196 is working? I'm confused. >> Think I'll try a few different ones. >> >> > My Xorg log shows this for 0x23 to 0x32 with 196. They're only > warnings. I've sometimes noticed occasional messages like this (say, > one or two of the values) when I start an application from an xterm, > but I don't do that very often. > > ĸen > Yeah...turns out to be an oldish mesa problem that I've never run across or at least never noticed. I get the same thing with 6.6.3 drivers, but at least I can do better than 310x230 or whatever it was reporting. I think it was actually 640x480, but some weird 310 value is what the log showed, xterms looked huge! Anyway, I've dropped back to ati-6.6.3 and upto xorg-server-1.4.0.90 + a few patches and am running happily at 1280x1024. I can't get it into 1600, but I don't use it anyway, so I haven't investigated yet.
-- DJ Lucas -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
