Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Ag. D. Hatzimanikas wrote these words on 03/02/08 04:52 CST:
>
>> Another thing that will give BLFS a boost is, if it was decided to support
>> multilib and other architectures then x86 (quoting Joe Ciccone).
>>
>> And in my opinion, all the {H,C}LFS developers has to be BLFS developers
>> too, which sounds very reasonable.
>
> What you don't understand Ag, is that all the CLFS devs who I thought
> could help the BLFS project were asked to help, but all denied.
> Some said they wouldn't mind being set up for commit privs, but
> not to count on any help from them (Ken being an exception in that
> he said he would try to help out).
>
I said I could help as well.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
