On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 10:07:46 -0600 Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > That way, the instructions would copy and paste for a newer version. > > A convenience for the user, and less updating pressure for Editors. > > I'm not a big fan of this as it sort of implies we support (have > tested) newer versions than what the book has in it. Additionally, > there are so many minor nuances (Moz packages might be an > exception as they normally don't require command changes) that > things could be a bit different (doc creation, test suites, > installed files, etc.).
Indeed, I backed off a bit. But for my own convenience I'd like to see all the 'hard-coded' versioning go. But, handiling 'patch' versions (for one) would be a pita. Maybe later. David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
