On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 8:53 PM, DJ Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, perhaps I'm just being dense since I don't use the old bootscripts
> anymore, but wouldn't this simple change solve our ills with the samba
> script and others? I mean, they seem to run correctly with the new
> pidofproc, which should be more transparent as to how they work, but
> this seems the best, IMO, to avoid a big change in the current scripts.
> And as a side effect, we get a cool little change from yellow WARN to
> green OK on screen. :-) For those affected, can you create a backup and
> give this change a try and test? Works for samba and stale pids, or is
> that not the only issue to work around WRT to improper PIDFILE handling?
>
> --- lfs/init.d/functions (revision 8496)
> +++ lfs/init.d/functions (working copy)
> @@ -567,8 +567,8 @@
> return 0 # 4
> ;;
> 1)
> - log_warning_msg "Unable to continue:
> ${pidfile} exists"
> - return 0 # 4
> + rm -f "${pidfile}"
> + log_warning_msg "removed invalid ${pidfile}"
> ;;
I missed this, but yeah, that's part of what I posted on LFS #2160.
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/ticket/2160
The problem is, for BLFS-6.3, we have to rely on the bootscripts from
LFS-6.3, which have this bug.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
