2008/3/31, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Wilco Beekhuizen wrote:
> > I only care for xmms. And a few months ago a new version of xmms was
> > released
>
>
> ...only to celebrate its birthday. It contains no differences to the previous
> one. Besides, how can the project be alive, if its CVS server is dead right
> now?
>
>
> > so technically it's still alive. The reasons why I don't use
> > audacious is because it's slow as hell. Try loading a few 1000 items
> > and scrolling through them with a fancy gtk2 listbox.
>
>
> Core 2 Duo E6420 @ 2.13 GHz, Intel 965G graphics chipset, 2094 songs,
> scrolling
> is very smooth. See the attached video file that shows how I pressed Play,
> scrolled through the playlist, and then pressed End to show the last item,
> as a
> proof. You can study the video frame by frame (e.g., mplayer -speed 0.1), and
> the clock is also captured for you to see that the video has not been
> tampered
> with. Sorry for bad quality, I had to make the video less than 50 kilobytes
> to
> pass without moderation.
>
I meant loading a playlist with 10.000+ items and then press 'j' to
quickjump. Now search for some string and watch audacious stutter and
use cpu. But I haven't used audacious in the last few years so maybe
they improved it.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
