On Sat, May 3, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This message for -Dev archive purposes only. > > > Comment (by [EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Replying to [comment:5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > I will concur that it appears safe enough to reference the library > > as a valid dependency for packages that support it. And it appears > > there is *no* conflict whatsoever with readline. > > > > destdir/share/man/man3/editline.3 > > I stand corrected as I've discovered the above mentioned file > is overwritten by the editline package. Not really any big deal, > but for thoroughness, and the archives, I'm mentioning this.
What is that a conflict with? Readline doesn't install that file. I'd imagine only libedit would install a man page for editline. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
