Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: >> The real problem with it is, if we keep holding for every version >> increment, we'll never get 6.3 out the door. > > And do we really need to get 6.3 out of the door? Essentially, without an > errata > page, without the team tracking security issues and bugs, it will be just a > snapshot, not a proper distro release. Maybe versionless BLFS (i.e., "always > use > svn") is the way to go?
Personally, I never use a released BLFS book. I can understand why some feel it is necessary or important, but for me, by the time it is released, it always feels so dated. Not a fault on any of the devs part, just a nature of the current setup, I think. Anyway, this isn't really a vote, whichever way the current BLFS devs want to do it is fine. I just think that there might be some advantages to a versionless book worthy of consideration. -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
