DJ Lucas wrote these words on 02/22/09 00:00 CST: > Following on from a discussion on the distro package dev list, we will > require a distro specific root CA certs file for OpenJDK/IcedTea when it > reaches a point that I deem 'stable' (see "OT" below sig).
I suppose it looks as though when I questioned this idea, I acted hesitant to DJ's idea. Seeing how Bruce gave me the "big picture", when I only needed to know what a "Distro specific CA certificate" was, means I missed entirely on my message to DJ. What I was getting at is the stuff about "Distro Specific", which still to me isn't defined, so I questioned it without mentioning in my initial reply that it was the OpenSSL suggestion that started me in the direction of confusion. And knowing that just in the last few days when DJ made comments that my Glib2 update commit required a package that my logs don't show is required, and I've since asked him twice with no reply, I do question things a bit more. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 20:02:00 up 16 days, 12:25, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.06, 0.01 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
