On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 02:22:18PM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote: > As BLFS packages are built on top of an LFS-6.5 system, insert the > following between the description of the package and the sect3 "Package > Information". > > <para>This package is known to build and work properly using an LFS-6.5 > platform.</para>
> Sound agreeable? Well, I'm perfectly happy to do it if it clarifies the issue. I know it will certainly be of use for packages that haven't had an update in a long time, but were last checked against who knows what platform. Libmad is a good example with -fforce-mem now being obsolete. It hasn't had an update in about 5 years, but it would, if I remember correctly, have worked perfectly well on LFS 6.3. I shall have to start writing these in once I get my 6.5 system up. I built my current base before the switch to GCC 4.4.1, so I have 4.4.0 at the moment. There shouldn't be much difference between the two, it's just a bugfix release afterall, but I'll sort out any issues that arise with the packages I've updated and put the note in.
pgp8LZlUTUVBO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
