Guy Dalziel schrieb: > I'm not suggesting that we drop both entries, I'm suggesting that we > change the optional parameters to something more explicitly obvious. > There will still be required and optional parameters, the optional ones > would just be rendered differently and in accordance with docbook.
sorry for my misunderstanding. to see the optional configure-script options in brackets would really be an idee i support!! the current visualisation with 'normal' and 'italic' i more than once just overlooked. thus: my thumb is up! maybe even one step further: required option "parameter" : italic requested option "<to be defined>" : normal optional option "option" : [italic] the new one has no high priority, but would be nice improvement. tobias -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
