2009/8/5 Guy Dalziel <[email protected]>: > > I've noticed that a lot of the pages don't make proper use of the > different tags. I'm suggesting it now partly because these will need to > be corrected anyway, and if people were to start using the optional tag > rather than doing one big mass conversion i think it would be quite > easy. However, now there is a slight problem: I grepped the book for any > uses of optional and I found Xpdf. Looking at the page on the site it > seems that optional renders exactly the same as option. That would > probably have to be addressed if we were to use it. >
As someone who has accidentally not used optional in the past, I confirm that it seems not to affect how the book is rendered. Therefore, I don't regard "correcting" the tags as a useful task. ĸen -- After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!" -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
