On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:08 AM, DJ Lucas<[email protected]> wrote: > Minus that slight change, and accounting for a few updated dependencies > that you haven't gotten to just yet, I've used your instructions > verbatim for the core and platform. I must say that you've done an > excellent job on Gnome so far! I'm happily typing away in a lite, but > very comfortable, Gnome-2.26.3 environment (minus additional apps and > without gnome-applets at all yet). Looks like all of the broken X > autotool checks were taken care of upstream. FWIW, I'm using /opt/X11 > (with updated packages I sent to the list yesterday) without an X11R6 > compatibility symlink, and the alternate /opt/gnome-2.26.3 prefix). Off > to rebuild the Mozilla stack...then I get to format and start from to > scratch again. :-) BTW, I want to tell you a thing that GNOME fixed but is not realted to GConf: GTK-Doc's silent check for Gnome-Doc-Utils is fixed (remeber a while ago? It became a upstream ticket that eventualy applied to Gnome Doc Utils), so the next GTK-doc version (1.12) will have the fix, as it's not in 1.11.
William -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
