Sami Tarazi schrieb: > Guy, William, I do apologise for this misunderstanding. Following the > posts of July, I was under the impression (wrongly) that is desirable > to keep db-4.5.20 for the time being. I tried db-4.7.25 with many > OpenLDAP releases. The combination that worked the best seemed to be > db-4.7.25 and OpenLDAP-2.4.18 as follows: >
im running db-4.7.25 with the "upstream_fixes-1.patch" from the patches project. with openldap i'm at 2.4.16 as this is the recommended stable release for production. see: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/225.html i had to apply a little patch to be able to compile with the 6.5 toolchain: in libraries/libutil/getpeereid.c i had to add #include "portable.h" 2.4.18 compiles without this patch. i hadn't the time for heavy testing, thus i still use 2.4.16 for production environment as recommended by the openldap people. greetings tobias -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
