Hi all, I believe I have all the kinks worked out for a clean build of Live Tex, which would end up replacing the deprecated teTeX. It is a beast; however, the biggest resource hog I've seen (disk space wise, anyway).
The only thing that might stand in our way right now is the sources ship in .xz format and BLFS does not have the XZ Utils package in the book yet, due to there not being a stable release yet. But, the current beta version of XZ Utils is like 0.999.99.9 and it is claimed on the web site that the 1.0 version will not have any changes from the current beta. Should we just go ahead and replace the LZMA package with XZ Utils now, as it really is inevitable (XZ Utils has all the LZMA stuff in it as well)? I can go either way, do it now, or wait for the stable release of XZ UTILS. William, everyone knows your stance on this. If you must, please post just *one* time on this subject. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.22] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 11:32:00 up 66 days, 16:40, 1 user, load average: 0.03, 0.01, 0.00 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
