On 09/26/2010 12:06 AM, linux fan wrote: > On 9/25/10, DJ Lucas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there any additional info that needs to be > > I dunno, > > The same Till Kamppeter > Submitted with patch on Sep 2009, updated on Jun 2010, still Unassigned: > Request for Enhancement, e.g. asking for a feature > One "usb" CUPS backend for both libusb-based and usblp-based access > http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3357+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+M20+Qusblp
Okay, then I'm going to leave it alone as upstream officially does not support anything other than libusb. While the hybrid patch looks good for backwards compatibility, I just don't see the point of it being added to BLFS as it still requires libusb. Why not just use libusb instead of kernel at that point? I figure that the added note covers the book's responsibility to the users, or at least puts them on the right track for the next couple of weeks till somebody can get to it (assuming here that something else does need to be done regarding udev permissions). If we do need to fix the udev rule permissions, I'm not comfortable with blindly allowing lp to /dev/bus/usb/*/*. The rules will have to be more specific than that. I opened a ticket so that it's not forgotten: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/3159 -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
