On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 12:55:48AM -0700, treah blade wrote: > I am unsure if anyone has been keeping an eye on this package as it is really > a require package if you will be using nfs at all in your system. The version > that currently is in blfs is 1.1.4 which at this point is over 2 years old > and now with the current version of LFS using a diffrent glibc no longer > builds cleanly. I understand that blfs does not always match up with the > current version of LFS but soon this pacakge will need to be updated in order > to continue to be availiable. One of the issues with the newer build of > this has diffrent requirements for dependancies then the old version. To be fair, BLFS is slowly getting more up-to-date now that we've dropped the requirement to build on LFS-6.5. I suspect that you and I are the only people who use nfs in BLFS. > > I was not sure if this had come up before or not, but I did search this > mailing list as far as the message I have recived and did not see anything > there. What I am wondering is if there were any plans to update this package > or if anyone had built one of the newer builds and had sorted all the > depenancies out yet? I have a current LFS install and have yet to be able to > get NFS working due to this pacakge not wanting to build with that toolchain > and the newer one requesting dependancies that I am not sure where to locate. >
I've got it (1.2.2) working *as a client with (only) nfs3* - please see ticket #2842. I'm a long way away from seeing if it works as a server with the same configuration hacks. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
