On 01/23/2011 03:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 02:06:39PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> DJ Lucas wrote: >> >>> I am going to revert the changes for the configuration sections for now >>> and leave the old in place with an added note. As far as the Mesa demos, >>> the license is very permissive for at least the two we use. Not a big >>> deal at all to drop them and a small Makefile into the Mesa source tree >>> directly. Any objections to that, or is there some interest in the whole >>> demos package? Thus far, we've only ever installed glxgears and glxinfo. >> The whole demos package might be interesting, but whether it is included >> in the book or not depends on the complexity. If it's easy, I suggest >> adding it. >> > I'm more interested in how useful, or not, it turns out to be.
Well, that was the deciding factor. I elected to just include glxgears and glxinfo as part of MesaLib-7.9. I looked at the rest of the xdemos. Some were pretty, but most are not useful for troubleshooting which is AFAIK, the only purpose of installing them. If somebody wants to add them, then we can remove the patch from the MesaLib page at a later date. For now, it works with what is in the book. -- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
