> Whereas Wayne's reply, above, seems to cast doubt on that. I'm only basing it on the trend of the last 2 years.
> Wayne, what do you plan to do when LFS-7.0 is released in a few weeks' > time: will you stick with LFS-6.8 (as a basis for a BLFS *release*) I'll probably merge my work into LFS-7 within a month or so after release. Changing from 6.7 to 6.8 wasn't that much of a big effort. > right through to release of BLFS-6.8; or will you switch to using > LFS-7.0 as a basis, prior to any release of BLFS-6.8 (which might > therefore never happen), and focus solely on BLFS-7.0 instead; or > will you do the two in parallel, merging between branches as > appropriate? > > What is the goal of your current 6.8 work? Is it a BLFS-6.8 release? Or > is it more from the 'rolling compiles' approach, to keep the engine > turning over 'til LFS-7.0, or what? > > Also, where are your current-work 6.8 patches &c being merged/committed into? > it's on my own private git repository. I've only started to use git over the last two months. > Per the earlier note ( > http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2011-August/021118.html > > Randy (project lead), Wayne (current ~main-active editor): what's your > plans for BLFS, in the immediate and medium and longer terms? > My focus will always be latest stable LFS + Latest stable Xorg + latest stable Gnome. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
