On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 11:44:48PM +0000, Andrew Benton wrote: > On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:25:17 -0600 > Bruce Dubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Also, the construct is not explained. I think it should be removed. > > I agree it should be explained, then people can make an informed > choice. I don't mind that it's different from the other pages where > useradd is used. > > Andy Agreed - difference in *how* things are done can be educational in BLFS. I'm just starting to look at bumping dbus to 1.4.16, I'll pick this up when I change it.
As always, don't hold your breath waiting for me to do it :) ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
