On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:58:55PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > > > Just looking at my gnome 2.30.2 installation. You can also argue that > > having /etc/gnome is not compliant because it has dbus in two locations > > /etc/gnome/2.30.2/dbus-1 and /etc/dbus-1. > > Are they the same? In /etc/dbus-1 I have: > > session.conf session.d system.conf system.d > > where the two directories are empty. > > I don't have a /etc/gnome/ yet. > > -- Bruce Beyond what Andy has noted - on this system I installed pulse (but gave up on it), as well as cups and polkit. In system.d/ I have
ken@ac30 ~ $ls -l /etc/dbus-1/system.d/ total 20 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 7305 Dec 13 00:18 ConsoleKit.conf -r--r--r-- 1 root root 460 Nov 29 13:53 cups.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 632 Dec 7 02:04 org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1408 Dec 13 00:01 pulseaudio-system.conf In my /etc/gnome version I have ken@ac30 ~ $ls -l /etc/gnome/dbus-1/system.d/ total 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 570 Dec 7 02:05 org.gnome.GConf.Defaults.conf which is from GConf-3.2.3. I'm also tempted to ask why we (both LFS and BLFS) should pay so much attention to fhs when it primarily exists for binary software. But, that might divert the thread, and will probably cause even more annoyance than I've managed so far, so I won't - for the moment ;-) ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
