On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:20:49 +0000 Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:46:07AM -0700, [email protected] wrote: > > + > > + <para>This package does not have a working testsuite.</para> > > + > > I was originally going to ask to have it minuted that this was > where I cracked and told the truth about a testsuite, after some > circumlocutions in earlier commits :-) > > And I was going to plead in mitigation that I've had it 'up to > here' with packages that need to be installed before their tests > will run (or, perhaps, since this is gnome, they expect you to be > running the previous stable version). For this one, I even went > back to a gnome session and reinstalled libpeas (the gnome devs > recommend seed as a dep for libpeas : that is circular, since seed > requires peas), but still there were two failures in the seed > tests. > > But instead, I'm going to suggest that we just stop mentioning > testsuites in BLFS. Or at least make it optional? Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
