On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 07:26:43PM +0100, Armin K. wrote: > I was thinking about upgrading wireless-tools for first. Now, I see two > version available. > > The latest stable version of Wireless Tools is version 29 > > > > The main features of the latest beta is support for non-ASCII ESSIDs > (such as localised ESSID), support for displaying Scanning Capabilities, > slightly bigger scan buffer, fixing minor bug iwconfig parser and minor > enhancement to ifrename : > > Wireless Tools version 30-pre9 (beta) > > > > I was thinking about using latest beta version because of such new > features. Big distros already use that one, and I personaly don't see > any issues with it. What do you think? Which one should I upgrade to?
In general, stable versions. People who want to use bleeding-edge can try e.g. fedora, arch, even (sometimes) debian unstable. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
