On 03/18/2012 05:55 AM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 03/18/2012 09:10 AM, DJ Lucas wrote:
>> Need to either correct the archives lib path with a sed, or drop the
>> --libdir switch and just move the so files after install on both packages.
>>
>> -- DJ Lucas
>>
>>
> As for this one, I switched it recently. It is easiest way for it, since
> it installs liba{ttr,cl}.so.x.x.x and liba{ttr,cl}.so.x in libdir, but
> liba{ttr,cl}.{so,a,la} are installed in libexecdir (/usr/lib in this
> case). There was a bug on the wiki that said if coreutils are
> recompiled, they would link against acl/attr (even utils that are in the
> /bin), so they would become unavailable when /usr is on seperate partition.
Yes, that is correct, the versioned so files should be placed into
/lib{,64} until the collapse of /usr ;-). It is both safer and easier to
run a sed on the la file to fix the path than adding a mv and readlink
block. I should be able to edit on the new system tomorrow. If you want
to fix it, cool, otherwise I'll take care of it tomorrow.
"sed 's@/lib@/usr/lib@' -i /usr/lib/libacl.la" and the same for libattr.la.
-- DJ Lucas
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
