On 05/01/2012 06:52 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm now attempting to debug the problems with my new LFS system.
> One of the minor ones was that the postfix shutdown failed and I got
> a line of 5 red stars to draw it to my attention. Turns out to be
> because the script kills ${PIDFILE} ${BINFILE} and $BINFILE was
> pointing to the now non-existent /usr/lib/postfix/master.
>
> I could just raise a ticket or change the bootscript directly, but
> I'd prefer discussion on whether we should allow old installations
> to continue to work with the current bootscripts. For the moment
> I've got
>
> if [ -f /usr/lib/postfix/master ]; then
> BINFILE=/usr/lib/postfix/master
> else
> BINFILE=/usr/libexec/postfix/master
> fi
>
> which should allow for either version. But do we want to go for a
> degree of backward compatability, or only let it shut down cleanly
> with the current installation ? If we do want compatability, is my
> test valid for lesser shells, or have I introduced a bash-ism ? I
> *think* it's good /bin/sh, but I never use other shells.
>
> ĸen
Use daemon_directory=/usr/lib/postfix in install command line if
necesary. I am avoiding libexec as much as possible for now, and that
one worked for me.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
