On 05/13/2012 01:49 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Author: bdubbs > Date: 2012-05-13 12:49:25 -0600 (Sun, 13 May 2012) > New Revision: 10201 > > Modified: > trunk/BOOK/general.ent > trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml > trunk/BOOK/x/lib/lib.xml > trunk/BOOK/x/lib/xulrunner.xml > Log: > Restore xulrunner > Actually, I've been thinking a bit more on this one. As a compromise, we could probably still get rid of the XUL Runner page and use only the Firefox page to first build XUL Runner, and then Firefox in a separate build directory from only the Firefox source tarball. This is the way Firefox should actually be built anyway for our purposes. Without the dev libs, a user cannot build browser extensions from source (still ignoring the fact that the build tree needs to kept around). The FF portion of the build should take < 0.1 SBU. The reason it is not done that way by default is that the Mozilla devs choose not to cater to developers, but rather end users...understandable give the huge Windows target, but a minor PITA for us and a source of mild disagreement. Anybody think this is a bad compromise?
-- DJ Lucas -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
