On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 21:38:29 +0100
Ken Moffat <[email protected]> wrote:

>   In March I fixed up the remaining packages which listed glib2 as a
> requirement, so that they now list pkg-config.  That was, of course,
> for 0.26 which itself required glib2.
> 
>  Now that we have a better version of pkgconfig, those dependencies
> are broken.  Here's my first suggestion:
> 
>  Change glib2 to *recommend* pkgconfig, and therefore drop the
> PCRE and LIBFFI overrides.  We *could* list these as optional
> commands, with an explanation of why there was a circular dependency
> with the previous pkgconfig, but I'd rather just drop them.

Recommend is fine but personally I'd put it under required. If Glib's
configure script uses Pkg-config that makes it a required dep in my
book. The Cflags and whatnot we used to use was an unusual measure to
get around the circular dependency between Pkg-config and Glib.

>  Follow this by reverting the glib -> pkgconfig part of the changes
> if the package is still 'live' in the book.  In practice, I'll do
> that by new changes.
> 
>  Anybody using the book after that will get the right deps.

Sounds good.

Andy
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to