On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 09:52:52AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
> > On 06/26/2012 11:02 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> 
> > Hm, we might have a problem. Mesa 8.1 release is scheduled to be 
> > released on 17.8 according to 
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2012-May/021473.html and 
> > I would like to see it in released BLFS since it brings so many 
> > improvements for NVidia, VMware and Intel dri and gallium drivers 
> > (probably radeon too, but I don't have such hardware to test it). Also, 
> > it is required if we want to include libdrm >> 2.4.33 for new Nouveau 
> > driver and other ones. I guess we could split packages in a month. I 
> > have one week or so to finish this exam stuff so I can help there too. 
> > It's just the Mesa that is bugging me. Would you agree if at least first 
> > 8.1 rc gets released before freeze that we add it, so we could later do 
> > possibly minor changes of upgrading it to stable release (yeah, that 
> > conflicts with package freeze, but I don't see any other option). I am 
> > not familiar with freeze stuff, but I guess we could not harm anything 
> > by upgrading to "bugfix" releases then, right?
> 
> The reason for a freeze is so that everyone is testing the same things 
> and we are checking that packages fit together and run properly.  We 
> have a couple of options here.  We could make an exception for Mesa and 
> libdrm and add those as exceptions to the freeze period.  We could also 
> push the projected freeze to mid August and the projected release to mid 
> September.
> 
 I'm in favour of delaying, or providing an exception for Mesa 8.1,
libdrm, ** and the radeon driver ** - the current radeon driver is
supposed to be fixed for the cairo problems, but it needs libdrm-2.4.35
and the nouveau part of Mesa-8.0 prevents that going into the book at the
moment.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to