LFS Trac wrote these words on 08/20/12 15:37 CST: > Comment(by Krejzi): > > I just want to say that I personaly won't make use of /usr/libexec > anywhere where I make the changes untill it is official. > > I was even thinking about reverting that for Postfix and vte-0.28 untill > it's official.
Are those the only two packages in BLFS currently using /usr/libexec? I realize that the issue right now is with LFS's Glibc, so just for the record I prefer individually named directories. But I can go either way, it is rather small. I know I will continue in my personal builds to create individual directories for each package the needs a libexec, but that's just me. Whatever we decide for the books is fine with me. I cc'd BLFS-Dev for anyone wishing to discuss this issue as it pertains to BLFS. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.24] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 16:10:01 up 3:14, 1 user, load average: 0.37, 0.21, 0.08 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
