On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:56:34PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > BLFS Trac wrote: > > #3521: GMime-2.6.10 > > ----------------------------------------+----------------------------------- > > Reporter: randy@… | Owner: blfs-book@… > > Type: enhancement | Status: new > > Priority: normal | Milestone: current > > Component: BOOK | Version: SVN > > Severity: normal | Keywords: > > ----------------------------------------+----------------------------------- > > > > Comment(by Krejzi): > > > > In GNOME 3.4, not all packages were able to use gmime-2.6, so I decided to > > keep 2.4. I'll upgrade it when I upgrade GNOME. Also, I must ask you not > > to report for anything that is related from GNOME. I will handle all of > > them when I upgrade GNOME. When the time comes, I'll create one single > > ticket with all packages that point to release dir so we don't get lot of > > tickets for that if that is okay with you guys? This will also include > > glib, pango, gtk+ and such. > > Sounds like a good plan overall, but for me I don't know which libraries > go with Gnome. For instance pango and gtk+ are in the section labelled > X libraries. I know these packages are also used outside of Gnome. > Should there be a separate section, something like Gnome General Purpose > Libraries? > Today (with the state of mailman) is perhaps not a good day to reply, but - I was going to reply to the ticket for gmime-2.6.10 until I saw it was being brought back to -dev, so
1. 2.6.1 gave me grief last year, it apparently needs gpgme, so I've been happy to stick to 2.4. 2. One single ticket has shades of "one ticket to rule them all" ;-) and as I think Randy said on the ticket - some of these packages are used more widely than just in gnome. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
