--- Em qui, 23/8/12, Ken Moffat escreveu: > De: Ken Moffat > Assunto: Re: [blfs-dev] Xulrunner 14.0.1 needs modification for Firefox > 14.0.1 [was: Xurunner ... ] > Para: "BLFS Development List" > Data: Quinta-feira, 23 de Agosto de 2012, 14:44 > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:48:54AM > -0700, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > > > To Ken: > > > > Sorry to come back to this again. > > > > 1. In the second _ln_, I believe the correct is the > _devel_ directory: > > > > s#ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell#ln -sv > -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell# > > > > In my own script, I've added [ the FIXME is for the > hardcoded > directory version ] > # FIXME and here > ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh > \ > /usr/lib/xulrunner-14.0.1 > >>$LOG 2>&1 && > # FIXME and here > ln -sv -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell \ > /usr/lib/xulrunner-14.0.1 > >>$LOG 2>&1 && > > and I'm fairly confident that I actually ran it like that > :)
Ok, but what I mean is that in the book it is *wrong*: the first, "ln" *correctly* points to "xulrunner-devel-14.0.1, but the second one, with xpcshell, is pointing to the *wrong* directory "xulrunner-14.0.1", not the devel one. > > 2. I noticed in the "Command Explanations": > > > > "ln -sv -f > ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh The > > run-mozilla.sh and xpcshell files have been moved in > this version, but > > the code which installs firefox (when linked to > xulrunner) was not > > updated. These symlinks allow firefox to install." > > > > Shouldn't it be: > > > > "ln -sv -f > ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/run-mozilla.sh and ln -sv > > -f ../xulrunner-devel-14.0.1/sdk/bin/xpcshell The > run-mozilla.sh and > > xpcshell files have been moved in this version, but the > code which > > installs firefox (when linked to xulrunner) was not > updated. These > > symlinks allow firefox to install." > > > > or you think rewritting the second _ln_ in is not > necessary in "Command > > Explanations"? > > > I have no knowledge of what is happening in firefox, but > somebody > reported a different problem on support and the link leads > me to > believe that things will be different in 15. And that > is due out > anytime - a comment elsewhere suggested that earlier this > week was > the likely time. I hope so. > For what I think will be a temporary command explanation, I > decided > to merge the two paragraphs - one command, but mention both > in the > explanation. That's okay with me, too. []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
