Em 17-07-2013 23:35, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >
>> >> OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.1 >> OpenJDK-1.0.7.40-2.4.2 > > Did you render the book? The title of the section is > OpenJDK-1.7.0.40/IcedTea-2.4.1. Actually, the IcedTea part is actually > not that critical as it is just a build harness. I indeed saw that title in r11452. I am so sorry to bother you with that, more yet when you must be in a hurry organizing the luggage to travel. I am a little less worried. You say that there is no possibility of vulnerabilities or bugs with two different versions of icedtea, only with different versions of jdk? Then it is just for build problems that they bother to produce a new icedte before a new jdk is released, right? I am trying to understand, and indeed, was not understanding. Then I will have just to check that the new icedtea builds OpenJDK correctly, for the book be updated accordingly. Am I understanding better now? >> It has happened in the past, IIRC, more than one time. So, if only >> icedtea changes, the book need a new openjdk, > > Really? Why? Because a new binary OpenJDK tarball has to be produced. Or not? Perhaps I am starting to understand. Repeating again, to be sure I understand, when a new icedtea is released, we can update just the icedtea part, without bothering to produce a new tarball? > > Please explain it to me again. What do you want to change in the latest > section of the book? > > -- Bruce > > I just want things to be right. The tarballs I sent have icedtea version in the name and internally in the main directory. So they have to be repacked with different name, and the md5sums must be changed, sizes should be ok. Should I do it and upload again? OK. no problem. Sorry if I understood differently. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
